Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 95-35
Journal of Public Economics 64 (1997): 359-387
Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation: Background Papers. Washington, D.C.: The Council, 1995-1996, v.3, pp. [BB1]-BB50
We investigate the design of an optimal Unemployment Insurance program using an equilibrium search and matching model calibrated using data from the reemployment bonus experiments and secondary sources. We examine (a) the optimal potential duration of UI benefits, (b) the optimal UI replacement rate when the potential duration of benefits is optimal, and (c) the optimal UI replacement rate when the potential duration of benefits is sub-optimal. There are three main conclusions. First, insurance considerations suggest that the potential duration of UI benefits would be unlimited under an optimal program. Hence, existing UI programs in the U.S. provide benefits for too short a period of time. Second, if the potential duration to benefits were unlimited, current replacement rates in the U.S., which are in the neighborhood of .5, would probably be about right. Third, with the potential duration of benefits limited to 26 weeks, as in most states during normal times, replacement rates of .5 are too low -- the optimal replacement rate is 1 if the potential duration of benefits is limited to 32 weeks or less.
Presented at Eastern Economic Association Annual Convention, New York, March 17-19, 1995; National Bureau of Economic Research Summer Institute (Public Economics and Social Insurance Sessions), Cambridge, Massachusetts, July 31-August 1, 1995; Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation Second Research Conference, Burlington, Vermont, August 17-18, 1995
Financial support provided by the Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation
UNEMPLOYMENT, DISABILITY, and INCOME SUPPORT PROGRAMS; Unemployment insurance; Benefits and duration
Get in touch with the expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Davidson, Carl, and Stephen A. Woodbury. 1995. "Optimal Unemployment Insurance." Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 95-35. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp95-35