Publication Date
1-1-1988
DOI
10.17848/9780880995344
Abstract
After summarizing the theoretical arguments for and against plant closing legislation, the authors present results of empirical analyses, based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Survey of Displaced Workers and other data sources, that show that having advance notice appears to reduce the probability that a displaced worker will suffer any spell of unemployment.
Files
Download Full Text (1.9 MB)
Note
Findings discussed in seminars at Cornell University, the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Upjohn Institute, and in a paper presented at the American Economic Association meeting, December 1987.
Sponsorship
Grants from the National Science Foundation Economics Program and the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
ISBN
9780880990707 (pbk.) ; 9780880995344 (ebook)
Subject Areas
LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Job security and unemployment dynamics; Dislocated workers
Citation
Ehrenberg, Ronald G. and George H. Jakubson. 1988. Advance Notice Provisions in Plant Closing Legislation. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880995344
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Do Advance Notice Provisions Matter?
3. Data Used in Our Analyses
4. The Determinants of Advance Notice—Do Workers Pay For It?
5. Advance Notice and Nonemployment Duration
6. Advance Notice and Survey Date Employment and Earnings
7. Implications of Findings
Appendices