Upjohn Institute working paper ; 18-293
Forthcoming in the Journal of Human Resources
This paper exploits temporal and spatial variation in the implementation of nine-city- and four state-level U.S. sick pay mandates to assess their labor market consequences. We use the synthetic control group method and traditional difference-in-differences models along with the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages to estimate the causal effects of mandated sick pay on employment and wages. We do not find much evidence that employment or wages were significantly affected by the mandates that typically allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick leave per work week, up to seven days per year. Employment decreases of 2 percent lie outside the 92 percent confidence interval and wage decreases of 3 percent lie outside the 95 percent confidence interval.
September 21, 2018
W.E. Upjohn Institute Early Career Research Award 17-150-15 ; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Policies for Action Program (#74921)
LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Wages, health insurance and other benefits
Get in touch with the expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Pichler, Stefan and Nicholas R. Ziebarth. 2018. "Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 18-293. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp18-293