Upjohn Author ORCID Identifier
Upjohn Institute working paper ; 23-380
In ILR Review (February 2024)
Good data on the size and composition of the independent contractor workforce are elusive, with household survey and administrative tax data often disagreeing on levels and trends. We carried out a series of focus groups to learn how self-employed independent contractors speak about their work. Based on these findings, we designed and fielded a large-scale telephone survey to elicit more accurate and complete information on independent contractors, including those who may be coded incorrectly as employees in conventional household survey data and those who are independent contractors in a secondary work activity. We find that, upon probing, roughly one in 10 workers who initially reports working for an employer on one or more jobs (and thus is coded as an employee) is in fact an independent contractor on at least one of those jobs. Incorporating these miscoded workers into estimates of work arrangement on the main job nearly doubles the share who are independent contractors, to about 15 percent of all workers. Young workers, less-educated workers, workers of color, multiple-job holders, and those with low hours are more likely to be miscoded. Taking these workers into account substantively changes the demographic profile of the independent contractor workforce. Our research indicates that probing in household surveys to clarify a worker’s employment arrangement and identify all low-hours work is critical for accurately measuring independent contractor work.
Upjohn project #69115
Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Russell Sage Foundation, and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Employment relationships; Nonstandard work arrangements
Get in touch with the expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Abraham, Katharine G., Brad J. Hershbein, Susan N. Houseman, and Beth C. Truesdale. 2023. "The Independent Contractor Workforce: New Evidence on Its Size and Composition and Ways to Improve Its Measurement in Household Surveys." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 23-380. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp23-380