Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 00-65
Journal of Human Resources 37(4) (Fall 2002): 913-927
This paper reviews the evidence on the effectiveness of individual merit pay systems for teachers on student achievement, and it presents new empirical results based on a system established within a collective bargaining environment. While many merit pay systems have been established in school districts across the U.S., very little empirical evidence concerning their influence on student achievement exists. A natural experiment arose in a county in which one high school piloted a merit pay system that rewarded student retention and student evaluations of teachers while another comparable high school maintained a traditional compensation system. A difference-in-differences analysis implies that merit pay had no effect on grade point averages, reduced the percentage of students who dropped out of courses, reduced average daily attendance, and increased the percentage of students who failed. The outcomes illustrate the difficulty of instituting individual merit pay in schools. The goal was to increase student retention. A student was considered to be retained in a class if the student was present during a randomly selected day of the last week of classes. The system "worked" by this measure because the school experienced a significant reduction in course noncompleters. However it is not clear that this measure was correlated with student achievement or even average attendance, and indeed, neither of these outcomes were improved.
August 2000, Version 1.5
Prepared for the National Academy of Sciences Conference, "Devising Incentives to Promote Human Capital," December 17-18, 1999, Irving, California
EDUCATION; K-12 Education; Teachers and compensation
Get in touch with the expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Eberts, Randall, Kevin Hollenbeck, and Joe Stone. 2000. "Teacher Performance Incentives and Student Outcomes." Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 00-65. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp00-65