"Wage Shocks and the Technological Substitution of Low-Wage Jobs" by Daniel Aaronson and Brian Phelan
 

Publication Date

12-15-2016

Series

Upjohn Institute working paper ; 17-266

**Published Version**

In The Economic Journal, 129(617): 1-34

DOI

10.17848/wp17-266

Abstract

We extend the task-based empirical framework used in the job polarization literature to analyze the susceptibility of low-wage employment to technological substitution. We find that increases in the cost of low-wage labor, via minimum wage hikes, lead to relative employment declines at cognitively routine occupations but not manually-routine or non-routine low-wage occupations. This suggests that low-wage routine cognitive tasks are susceptible to technological substitution. While the short-run employment consequence of this reshuffling on individual workers is economically small, due to concurrent employment growth in other low-wage jobs, workers previously employed in cognitively routine jobs experience relative wage losses.

Issue Date

December 15, 2016

Subject Areas

LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Wages, health insurance and other benefits; Minimum wage

Share

Get in touch with the expert

Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our communications staff.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Policy Citations: 2
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 1306
    • Abstract Views: 864
see details

COinS
 

Citation

Aaronson, Daniel and Brian J. Phelan. 2017. "Wage Shocks and the Technological Substitution of Low-Wage Jobs." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 17-266. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp17-266