Series

Upjohn Institute working paper ; 23-389

DOI

10.17848/wp23-389

Issue Date

November 2023

Abstract

When minimum wages increase, employers may respond to the regulatory burdens by substituting away from disadvantaged workers. We test this hypothesis using a correspondence study with 35,000 applications around ex-ante uncertain minimum wage increases in three U.S. states. Before the increases, applicants with distinctively Black names were 19 percent less likely to receive a callback than equivalent applicants with distinctively white names. Announcements of minimum wage hikes substantially reduce callbacks for all applicants but shrink the racial callback gap by 80 percent. Racial inequality decreases because firms disproportionately reduce callbacks to lower-quality white applicants who benefited from discrimination under lower minimum wages.

Subject Areas

LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Job search; Wages, health insurance and other benefits; Inequality; Minimum wage

Share

Get in Touch With The Expert

Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .

COinS
 

Citation

Brandon, Alec, Justin E. Holz, Andrew Simon, and Haruka Uchida. 2023. "Minimum Wages and Racial Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Field Experiment." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 23-389. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp23-389

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.