Publication Date
11-8-2023
Series
Upjohn Institute working paper ; 23-389
DOI
10.17848/wp23-389
Abstract
When minimum wages increase, employers may respond to the regulatory burdens by substituting away from disadvantaged workers. We test this hypothesis using a correspondence study with 35,000 applications around ex-ante uncertain minimum wage increases in three U.S. states. Before the increases, applicants with distinctively Black names were 19 percent less likely to receive a callback than equivalent applicants with distinctively white names. Announcements of minimum wage hikes substantially reduce callbacks for all applicants but shrink the racial callback gap by 80 percent. Racial inequality decreases because firms disproportionately reduce callbacks to lower-quality white applicants who benefited from discrimination under lower minimum wages.
Issue Date
November 2023
Note
Upjohn project #58161
Sponsorship
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Early Career Research Award No. 22-58161-14
Subject Areas
LABOR MARKET ISSUES; Job search; Wages, health insurance and other benefits; Inequality; Minimum wage
Get in touch with the expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Included in
Citation
Brandon, Alec, Justin E. Holz, Andrew Simon, and Haruka Uchida. 2023. "Minimum Wages and Racial Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Field Experiment." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 23-389. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp23-389