Upjohn Author ORCID Identifier
Series
Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 04-99
**Published Version**
In Growth and Change 36(2): 139-166
In Reining in the Competition for Capital, Ann Markusen, ed. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 2007, pp.103-140
DOI
10.17848/wp04-99
Issue Date
February 2004
Abstract
This paper reviews the research literature relevant to economic development incentives provided by state and local governments, and recommends reforms in these incentives. I argue that the main problem with current incentive policies is that state and local governments often provide incentives that are not in the best interest of that state or local area, for example that are excessively costly per job created, or that provide jobs that do not improve the job opportunities of local residents. I suggest that reforms should be "bottom-up" rather than "top-down." Regulation of incentives by the federal government, or by international trade treaties, may prevent both desirable and undesirable incentives. "Bottom-up" reforms would include more information on incentive offers, a budget constraint on the volume of incentives, stronger standards for job quality, accessibility, and performance in incentives, and better benefit-cost analyses of incentives.
Subject Areas
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; Regional policy and planning; Business and tax incentives
Get in Touch With The Expert
Want to arrange to discuss this work with the author(s)? Contact our .
Included in
Citation
Bartik, Timothy J. 2004. "Incentive Solutions." Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 04-99. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp04-99